Five Differences Between Canadian And American Health Care Systems

Public Health

Al Adala Public Health Clinic, Najaf, Iraq

(Released to Public) Al Janaa Public Health Clinic, under construction in Najaf, central Iraq. This clinic, managed and quality-controlled by the US Army Corps of Engineers, is one of 143 that are to be built throughout Iraq. There are three standard plans, A, B, and C, and all will be fully-equiped with the diagnostic and testing equipment. USACE MAJ William Smith, NY Times reporter Craig Smith, and SSG Robin McIvor discuss progress at this ACoE work site.

Five Differences Between Canadian And American Health Care Systems

The numbers in this article come from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Frequently Requested Data 2009 unless noted otherwise.

A Surprising Similarity

Often people talk about the Canadian health care system being public and the American health care system being private. It is a surprise, then, to learn that both systems have both public and private health insurance. Private health insurers in Canada provide supplementary health insurance for services not covered by the public system. America has several public health insurance programs.

1. In 2007 100 per cent of Canadians were covered by the public system, while in America 28 percent were covered.

In Canada no one is uninsured, while in America about 15 per cent are uninsured. Almost 68 per cent of Americans have private health insurance. See American Census Health Insurance Coverage Status.

The American public system covers people over age 65, veterans and people with low incomes. During a person’s life almost half of all health care spending is after age 65. See Alemayehu, B. and K.E. Warner 2004.  Since most of people covered by the American public system are age 65 or older, the cost per person covered is higher than for private insurers.

2. In 2007 health care in Canada made up 10 per cent of the economy, while in America it made up 16 per cent.

The health care system in America is a bigger part of the economy than in Canada. This was not always the case. In 1960 health care was 5.8 per cent of Canada’s economy and 5.3 per cent of America’s economy. Health care costs in America have grown faster than in Canada.

3. In 2007 Canada’s public system paid for 70 per cent of health care, while in America the public system paid for 45 per cent.

In 1960 Canada’s public system covered 43 per cent of health care costs while America’s public system covered 23 percent. During the 1960s both the Canadian and American Medicare programs were introduced and by 1971 Canada’s program covered 73 per cent of health care costs, while America’s program covered 37 per cent. Canadian public coverage peaked at 77 per cent in 1976 and has gone down since then. American public coverage continued to grow.

In America, about 19 per cent of health spending is “out of pocket”. See The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.    In Canada about 17 per cent of health spending is “out of pocket”. See Exploring the 70/30 Split: How Canada’s Health Care System Is Financed.

4. In 2007 total health care spending in Canada was ,895 (USD) per person, while in America it was ,290 (USD).

On a per person basis, America spends nearly 90 per cent more on health care than Canada. While Americans have always spent more than Canadians, the gap has widened over the years. In 1960 Americans spend about 19 per cent more than Canadians. The gap was 65 per cent in 1992 and reached 90 per cent by 1996.

5. In 2007 public system health care spending in Canada was about ,700 (USD) per person, while in America it was about ,300 (USD).

It was not always the case that America public spending was higher than Canada’s. From 1960 to 1993, Canada’s public system spent more per person than the American public system. Between 1992 and 1996, the Canadian government kept public health care spending fixed at about ,450 per person. Public health care spending grew after 1996.

In other articles I will look at the cost of health care:

Where Does The Money We Spend On Health Care Go?

public health

“First rate advice.” –APHA What sort of training do you need to work in public health? What kinds of jobs are out there right now? And what exactly is an epidemiologist, anyway? Answering these questions and more, this career guide provides an overview of the numerous options in public health and the many different roads to get there. Whether you’re a student who wants to launch a career or a professional looking to change careers, this guide offers an easy introduction to the field.

101 Careers in Public Health

Click on the button for more public health information and reviews.

Marijuana Use Increases Risk of Car Accidents
public health
Lead author Dr. Guohua Li, a professor of epidemiology at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, said that while alcohol use is down, pot smoking is up. A recent survey by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration …

public health question by mindygallo22: What are 2 public health concerns that have a bearing on nutritonal status?
I have to a do a nutrition project for nursing school and I have to write something on the following question but I can’t figure out what the 2 public health concerns may be. Any help?

What are 2 public health concerns that have a bearing on nutritonal status?

public health best answer:

Answer by Jessi
Salmonella tomatoes…

and other bad fruits and veggies…

Public Health

Al Adala Public Health Clinic, Najaf, Iraq

(Released to Public) Al Janaa Public Health Clinic, under construction in Najaf, central Iraq. This clinic, managed and quality-controlled by the US Army Corps of Engineers, is one of 143 that are to be built throughout Iraq. There are three standard plans, A, B, and C, and all will be fully-equiped with the diagnostic and testing equipment. USACE MAJ William Smith, NY Times reporter Craig Smith, and two Iraqi sub-contractors discuss progress at this ACoE work site.

Health Insurance Co-Ops Are Good Option

The numbers in this article come from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Frequently Requested Data 2009 unless noted otherwise.

A Surprising Similarity

Often people talk about the Canadian health care system being public and the American health care system being private. It is a surprise, then, to learn that both systems have both public and private health insurance. Private health insurers in Canada provide supplementary health insurance for services not covered by the public system. America has several public health insurance programs.

1. In 2007 100 per cent of Canadians were covered by the public system, while in America 28 percent were covered.

In Canada no one is uninsured, while in America about 15 per cent are uninsured. Almost 68 per cent of Americans have private health insurance. See American Census Health Insurance Coverage Status.

The American public system covers people over age 65, veterans and people with low incomes. During a person’s life almost half of all health care spending is after age 65. See Alemayehu, B. and K.E. Warner 2004.  Since most of people covered by the American public system are age 65 or older, the cost per person covered is higher than for private insurers.

2. In 2007 health care in Canada made up 10 per cent of the economy, while in America it made up 16 per cent.

The health care system in America is a bigger part of the economy than in Canada. This was not always the case. In 1960 health care was 5.8 per cent of Canada’s economy and 5.3 per cent of America’s economy. Health care costs in America have grown faster than in Canada.

3. In 2007 Canada’s public system paid for 70 per cent of health care, while in America the public system paid for 45 per cent.

In 1960 Canada’s public system covered 43 per cent of health care costs while America’s public system covered 23 percent. During the 1960s both the Canadian and American Medicare programs were introduced and by 1971 Canada’s program covered 73 per cent of health care costs, while America’s program covered 37 per cent. Canadian public coverage peaked at 77 per cent in 1976 and has gone down since then. American public coverage continued to grow.

In America, about 19 per cent of health spending is “out of pocket”. See The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.    In Canada about 17 per cent of health spending is “out of pocket”. See Exploring the 70/30 Split: How Canada’s Health Care System Is Financed.

4. In 2007 total health care spending in Canada was ,895 (USD) per person, while in America it was ,290 (USD).

On a per person basis, America spends nearly 90 per cent more on health care than Canada. While Americans have always spent more than Canadians, the gap has widened over the years. In 1960 Americans spend about 19 per cent more than Canadians. The gap was 65 per cent in 1992 and reached 90 per cent by 1996.

5. In 2007 public system health care spending in Canada was about ,700 (USD) per person, while in America it was about ,300 (USD).

It was not always the case that America public spending was higher than Canada’s. From 1960 to 1993, Canada’s public system spent more per person than the American public system. Between 1992 and 1996, the Canadian government kept public health care spending fixed at about ,450 per person. Public health care spending grew after 1996.

In other articles I will look at the cost of health care:

Where Does The Money We Spend On Health Care Go?

In looking for better ways to establish affordable healthcare for all American citizens, discussions are taking place about the development of health insurance co-ops. In these days it is becoming a hot topic in the country. In terms of healthcare reform, health insurance co-ops, which would be developed by groups as small scale businesses, could be an option for those who need health insurance. For the people those who do not like the idea of the public insurance option, it may be the good alternative.
According to a Harvard Medical School study, 45,000 Americans die due to lack of health insurance every year because they cannot get adequate care. This number is the equivalent in number of deaths to a little more than one 9/11 disaster per month, year in, year out.
Non-profit health insurance cooperative could be third alternative to the traditional private health insurance and newly proposed public health insurance. Cooperative is the good idea to provide around 47 million uninsured and struggling Americans with an alternative to the private health insurance. The co-op proposal come in large part due to some challenges in generating widespread public and political support for a public health insurance option.

Advantages
· Health insurance cooperatives are non-profit organizations, and are neither run by government nor by companies.
· They have some of the strengths of public option in that they are able to give competition for the insurance companies. Moreover, it meets some of the objections from others who do not want a government-run plan, as they are membership-run and membership-controlled, not government-controlled.
· They represent thousands of members, so they have better negotiating power with providers, keeping costs lower than individual insurance company. Additional savings come from the absence of profit pursuit and their non-taxable status.
· Co-ops are driven by health interests of members, and is not beholden to shareholders.
· As non-profit enterprises, they would not have to worry about generating returns for shareholders. They could use that freedom to reduce members’ premiums or put more money into improving care. Their primary allegiance and accountability are to that membership base and customer base.
· Having low administrative costs, their big focus is on putting the dollars into health care and not into administration. Being owned by members could make them more accountable to consumers.

Usually medicine has been a mix of state, non-profit, and for-profit actors and it’s worth broadening the mix of insurance options available to ordinary people. But, co-ops are a part of healthy non-profit, private, public health care mix. They accomplish same goal as public plan, and competes with insurers. One thing we need in the system is more competition. In the sense, they are a good idea as they give competition to for-profit insurance companies.
Health insurance cooperatives can generate an independent stream of revenues. This compares favorable against a government-run public insurance option, which is dependent on taxpayer funding and the whims of government budget allocations. In this sense, co-ops offer a good competitive alternative to private health insurance companies.
Co-ops can scale in a decentralized and community-focused manner. The model can work very well in filling the gaps left by the private insurance industry. And, in this sense, co-ops can compete well on a local level. Most important thing is that co-ops are more community-focused than large insurance companies.
In co-ops people like the small community feel. It provides more personal attention. Large insurance companies and bureaucracies lose their community feel very easily. In that scale at local level co-ops can compete more effectively with the idea that they are more community-oriented and it is very easy to deal with them.
Co-ops implement a more holistic, preventive approach. System emphasizes primary care medicine and preventive care which is a major contributor, especially in the time of skyrocketing health costs.
Co-ops are more political feasible than public insurance. The public plan is too contentious to pass. While it has significant support, it also has extremely fervent opposition. Passing it would create a near revolutionary-level of outrage. Avoiding this is important, and adapting a co-op model is a good means of doing this.
In co-ops members would feel in control. There is a sense of transparency. They are cooperatively governed. Members are eligible to vote in the organization, and they have a say in how to organize care and design benefits. Members could participate in reviews of grievances and in discussion about the benefits packages. Most of the work is done by the board of trustees that has elected by members.
Cooperatives can deliver high-quality care, and could do a better job of controlling costs than some of the inflationary models. Co-op model could be a manageable and efficient system, when the question of the cost of medical care arises. It could be a good compromise.
 

public health

This book was converted from its physical edition to the digital format by a community of volunteers. You may find it for free on the web. Purchase of the Kindle edition includes wireless delivery.This book was converted from its physical edition to the digital format by a community of volunteers. You may find it for free on the web. Purchase of the Kindle edition includes wireless delivery.

A Handbook of Health

Click on the button for more public health information and reviews.

More suspected measles cases
public health
Public health officials are urging people to check their immunisation status as measles cases start appearing in Wellington. Tests are being done to confirm two probable cases (a Wellington adult and a Hutt Valley pre-schooler), following verification …

public health question by shanell: How do I get into the public health field?
I want to start a career in public health. I currently work at a bank doing Risk/Fraud (for 4 years) and I have a bachelor’s degree in Journalism.
I want to do something rewarding. Where and how can I start a career in Public Health? Also what type of businesses offer jobs in public health?

public health best answer:

Answer by Bella
i think you should get an internship and appy to get your masters in public health. If not, then lots of volunteering and building a network can help u get in.